Search for: All records

Abstract Understanding the origin of novel morphological traits is a long‐standing objective in evolutionary developmental biology. We explored the developmental genetic mechanisms that underpin the formation of a textbook example of evolutionary novelties, the cephalic horns of beetles. Previous work has implicated the gene regulatory networks associated with compound eye and ocellar development in horn formation and suggested that horns and compound eyes may influence each other's sizes. Therefore, we investigated the functional significance of genes central to visual system formation in the initiation, patterning, and size determination of head horns across three horned beetle species. We find that while the downregulation of canonical eye patterning genes reliably reduces or eliminates compound eye formation, it does not alter the position or shape of head horns yet does result in an increase in relative horn length. We discuss the implications of our results for our understanding of the genesis of cephalic horns in particular and evolutionary novelties in general. 

1. Microbial symbionts play a crucial role in the development, health, and homeostasis of their hosts. However, the eco‐evolutionary conditions shaping these relationships and the evolutionary scale at which host–microbiome interactions may diverge warrant further investigation, especially in non‐model systems. This study examines the impact of reciprocal gut microbiome transplants between two ecologically very similar, sympatric, and syntopic dung beetle sister species. 2.Onthophagus vaccaandOnthophagus mediuswere specifically used to compare the growth, development, and fitness outcomes of individuals that were either (i) reared in the presence of a microbiome provided by a mother of the same species (“self‐inoculated”), (ii) forced to develop with a microbiome derived from a heterospecific mother (“cross‐inoculated”), or (iii) reared without a maternally transmitted microbiome. 3. This study found that individuals reared in the absence of a maternally derived gut microbiome incur detrimental changes in survival, as well as in several metrics signalling normative development. Furthermore, such negative effects are only partly rescued through inoculation with a heterologous microbiome. 4. Collectively, this study's results suggest that inoculation with a species‐specific, maternally transmitted microbiome is critical for normative development, that the significance of maternally derived microbiota for host survival differs across species, and that the phenotypic outcomes resulting from host–microbiome interactions may diverge even between closely related, ecologically similar host species. 

Abstract Colonization of new environments can lead to population bottlenecks and rapid phenotypic evolution that could be due to neutral and selective processes. Exotic populations of the bull‐headed dung beetle (Onthophagus taurus) have differentiated in opposite directions from native beetles in male horn‐to‐body size allometry and female fecundity. Here we test for genetic and transcriptional differences among two exotic and one nativeO. tauruspopulations after three generations in common garden conditions. We sequenced RNA from 24 individuals for each of the three populations including both sexes, and spanning four developmental stages for the two exotic, differentiated populations. Identifying 270,400 high‐quality single nucleotide polymorphisms, we revealed a strong signal of genetic differentiation between the three populations, and evidence of recent bottlenecks within and an excess of outlier loci between exotic populations. Differences in gene expression between populations were greatest in prepupae and early adult life stages, stages during which differences in male horn development and female fecundity manifest. Finally, genes differentially expressed between exotic populations also had greater genetic differentiation and performed functions related to chitin biosynthesis and nutrient sensing, possibly underlying allometry and fecundity trait divergences. Our results suggest that beyond bottlenecks, recent introductions have led to genetic and transcriptional differences in genes correlated with observed phenotypic differences. 

Abstract Developmental processes transduce diverse influences during phenotype formation, thereby biasing and structuring amount and type of phenotypic variation available for evolutionary processes to act on. The causes, extent, and consequences of this bias are subject to significant debate. Here we explore the role of developmental bias in contributing to organisms’ ability to innovate, to adapt to novel or stressful conditions, and to generate well integrated, resilient phenotypes in the face of perturbations. We focus our inquiry on one taxon, the horned dung beetle genusOnthophagus, and review the role developmental bias might play across several levels of biological organization: (a) gene regulatory networks that pattern specific body regions; (b) plastic developmental mechanisms that coordinate body wide responses to changing environments and; (c) developmental symbioses and niche construction that enable organisms to build teams and to actively modify their own selective environments. We posit that across all these levels developmental bias shapes the way living systems innovate, adapt, and withstand stress, in ways that can alternately limit, bias, or facilitate developmental evolution. We conclude that the structuring contribution of developmental bias in evolution deserves further study to better understand why and how developmental evolution unfolds the way it does.